Electoral receipt · State Senate
IMRAN ANGELOV FAROOQ
State Senate · SEN-31 · 2024 cycle
Funding Receipt
IMRAN ANGELOV FAROOQ · 2024 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 702 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) -$72,667 · -7%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $107,307 · 11%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $962,142 · 97%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 CA Real Estate PAC $11,900
02 Association of CA School Administrators PAC $10,900
03 Cal Fire Local 2881 $10,900
04 California State Council of Laborers PAC $10,900
05 Khan, Mohammed · Consulting. $10,050
06 Re-Elect Fional Ma For State Treasurer 2022 $9,800
07 Maheshwari, Deepak · Marwar Ventures, LLC $7,500
08 Guardado, Alberto · Real Estate Collective Group $7,500
09 CA State Association of Electrical Workers $7,500
10 PACE of CA School Employees $6,800
11 Southern CA Pipe Trades Dist Council 16 $6,000
12 Polaris Strategies, Inc. $5,820
13 cMax-2000 Inc. $5,550
14 Cendejas, Robert E · Robert E Cendejas $5,500
15 Local Union 440 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers $5,500
16 Plumbers & Pipefittesr Local 364 PAC $5,500
17 Riverside City Teachers Assn. Political Action Group for Education-Candidates $5,500
18 Global Premier Development $5,500
19 Huang, Cindy · EC lending $5,500
20 Business Locaation Advisors Inc. $5,500
21 Cendejas, Lillyan E · n/a $5,500
22 Khan, Sana · Seashore medical $5,500
23 March and Ash, Inc $5,500
24 Salib, Paul · CRP Affordable $5,500
25 Sayeed, Athar · Hajera sultana md $5,500
Primary committee total $996,782
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Senate in this cycle (e.g. "IMRAN ANGELOV FAROOQ for Assembly 2024"). The wider footprint shows every committee IMRAN ANGELOV FAROOQ controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.