Electoral receipt · State Assembly
THOMAS WONG
State Assembly · ASM-49 · 2022 cycle
Funding Receipt
THOMAS WONG · 2022 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 342 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) -$33,150 · -46%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $20,800 · 29%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $84,400 · 117%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Imada, Bill · IW Group Inc. $4,900
02 Parfrey, Jonathan · Climate Resolve $4,900
03 Southern CA Edison $4,900
04 Sham, Stephen · Plaza Printing $3,500
05 Frierson, Tarrance · Southern CA Edison $2,900
06 Wong, Ronald W · Imprenta Communications $2,750
07 Choi, Caroline · Edison International $2,500
08 Steven Ly For Rosemead $2,250
09 Pacific Plaza Premier Holdings LLC $1,500
10 Teoh, Daphne · n/a $1,300
11 Asian American Small Business PAC $1,000
12 CHANG, FREDERICK · Moss Adams LLP $1,000
13 Coldwell Banker George Realty $1,000
14 Tsai, Mitchell · MITCHELL M. TSAI, ATTORNEY AT LAW PC $1,000
15 Wang & Yeh Medical Group $1,000
16 Wong, George K · George K Wong $1,000
17 Wong, Tin-Cheu MD $1,000
18 Chan, David · Chan Investment Group $700
19 Liu, Judith · n/a $700
20 Yin, George · Kaufman Legal Group $600
21 Advanced Home Health Services Inc. $500
22 Chi Lam MD Inc $500
23 Conlon, Kira · Sheppard Mullin $500
24 GTM Group Holdings LLC(Mike Gatto) $500
25 Gutierrez, Luis · Southern California Edison $500
Primary committee total $72,050
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "THOMAS WONG for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee THOMAS WONG controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.