Electoral receipt · State Assembly
KELLY WILLETT TANNER
State Assembly · ASM-1 · 2022 cycle
Funding Receipt
KELLY WILLETT TANNER · 2022 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 41 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $5,220 · 29%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $4,800 · 27%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $7,777 · 44%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Tanner, Kelly · homemaker $4,027
02 Willett, Kathleen · Retired $3,500
03 PDI $1,050
04 Willett, Dennis · Denco Lien Sales, Inc $1,000
05 Jackson, Lisa · Retired $500
06 Jackson, Lee · Walton Construction, Inc. $500
07 Gulbransen, Kathryn · homemaker $500
08 Young, John · 530 Capitol Partners $500
09 Hren, Robert · Retired $500
10 Singh Market LLC DBA, Red and White Market $500
11 Gray, Michael · GFT Capital $300
12 Jones, Shawnel · Homemaker $270
13 MacDonald, Lisa · Sunset Real Estate $250
14 Rothlisberger, Jenny · Homemaker $250
15 Germann, Melissa · Glendora Unified School District $250
16 Johnson, Steven J. · Retired $250
17 Smith, Sarah · Homemaker $250
18 Cross, Karen · Retired $250
19 Messick, Elisabeth · Retired $250
20 Klinger, Karen · Retired $250
21 Ferrell, Douglas · Pattrell Engineering, Inc $200
22 Tanner, Richard · Tanner Law Office $200
23 Scott, Terri · Terri A. Scott, PhD $200
24 Bronson, Carolyn · Retired $200
25 Potter, Phillip · Retired $200
Primary committee total $17,797
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "KELLY WILLETT TANNER for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee KELLY WILLETT TANNER controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.