Electoral receipt · State Assembly
MIA LIVAS PORTER
State Assembly · ASM-52 · 2022 cycle
Funding Receipt
MIA LIVAS PORTER · 2022 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 317 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $70,247 · 54%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $20,272 · 15%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $40,400 · 31%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 SEAMAN, NATALIE · Not Employed $7,700
02 Farrington, Amy · Self $4,900
03 Sunnova Energy Corporation $4,900
04 Tsai, Mitchell · MITCHELL M. TSAI ATTORNEY AT LAW PC $4,100
05 Henry, Lisa · Not employed $4,050
06 Dake, Glen · GDML $4,000
07 Cagna, Denis · EY $4,000
08 Ginsberg, Ellen · Not Employed $3,500
09 Democrats for Neighborhood Action $2,500
10 Solar, Sunrun · Sunrun $2,500
11 Seith, Patricia · Not Employed $2,450
12 Dorf, Samantha · Not Employed $2,200
13 James, Bonnie · Not Employed $2,200
14 Abrahams, Luann · Not employed $2,000
15 Hair, Terry · Eisner Healthcare $1,950
16 Porter, Michael · Fox Sports $1,725
17 Guttman, David · Bastion Technologies $1,662
18 LoPilato, Krystal · Villarreal Hutner PC $1,575
19 Johnson, Hans · Progressive Victory $1,500
20 Wang, Tim · TDW+Co $1,500
21 Boe, Patricia · Not Employed $1,080
22 Plata For Assembly 2020 $1,000
23 Blake, Jennifer · Diversity Hire $1,000
24 KENTOR, ERIC · Not Employed $1,000
25 Everytown for Gun Safety $1,000
Primary committee total $130,919
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "MIA LIVAS PORTER for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee MIA LIVAS PORTER controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.