Electoral receipt · State Senate

CATHERINE BLAKESPEAR

State Senate · SEN-38 · 2026 cycle

Funding Receipt

CATHERINE BLAKESPEAR · 2026 cycle

★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★

Raised for this race $1,330,539

Funding mix · 629 unique donors · primary committee

S Small donors (Under $500) $68,047 · 5%

M Medium donors ($500–$999) $61,640 · 5%

L Large donors ($1,000+) $1,200,853 · 90%

Where the money comes from

50% from named interests

What this means →

Sort by

Interest	Amount	Share	Gifts	Donors
Individuals (no industry data disclosed)unattributable	$199K	26%	373	260
Other organizations (unclassified)unattributable	$182K	24%	75	65
Candidate / party transfers	$82K	11%	19	18
Healthcare / pharma / medical	$40K	5%	42	34
Real estate & development	$37K	5%	26	17
Tribal governments / gaming	$36K	5%	17	9
Teachers & education	$33K	4%	4	3
Other named interests 6 categories below 1%: Construction & contractors, Entertainment & media, Agriculture, Nurses & healthcare workers, Gaming / sports betting, Engineers & scientists (public)	$28K	4%	23	18
Building trades / construction labor	$26K	3%	4	4
Other labor unions	$24K	3%	3	3
Finance & banking	$24K	3%	39	8
Energy & utilities	$13K	2%	12	11
Public safety (police/fire)	$11K	1%	6	2
Business & trade groups	$11K	1%	6	4
Legal / trial lawyers	$11K	1%	17	14

Headline excludes self-funding and the unattributable individuals bucket — gifts from people for whom employer/occupation either isn't disclosed (Cal-Access leaves it blank on roughly 85% of individual contributions) or doesn't fit any sector category. Named interests below 1% of total raised collapse into a single "Other named interests" row to keep the long tail legible; the rolled-up category names are listed inline beneath that row. See the methodology for the classifier rules and the two distinct reasons a gift becomes unattributable.

Top donors to primary committee (25 shown)

01 California Democratic Party $45,500

02 Catherine Blakespear for Senate 2022 $38,810

03 Faculty for our University's Future, a Committee Sponsored by the California Faculty Association Small Contributor Committee $11,800

04 California Real Estate PAC (CREPAC) - California Association of Realtors Small Contributor Committee $11,800

05 Google, LLC and Affiliated Entities $11,800

06 Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians $11,800

07 Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation $11,800

08 United Domestic Workers of America Action Fund Small Contributor Committee $11,800

09 Association of California School Administrators PAC Small Contributor Committee $11,800

10 Building a Stronger Future for California PAC, sponsored by Western States Regional Council of Carpenters PAC SCC $11,800

11 California Teachers Association/Association For Better Citizenship Small Contributor Committee $11,800

12 Orange County Professional Firefighter's Association PAC $11,800

13 SEIU California State Council Small Contributor Committee $11,800

14 California Nurses Association PAC (CNA-PAC) Small Contributor Committee $11,500

15 Davita, Inc. $11,500

16 Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake (HPUL) $11,400

17 First Foundation Bank $11,325

18 California Professional Firefighters PAC Small Contributor Committee $11,000

19 California Building Industry Association PAC $10,500

20 Irvine Management Company $10,500

21 Walmart, Inc. $10,500

22 Singleton Schreiber, LLP $10,000

23 Genentech USA $9,800

24 LE03 - A Win Management, Inc./Republic Services $9,500

25 Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation $9,400

Primary committee total $1,330,539

Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology

What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Senate in this cycle (e.g. "CATHERINE BLAKESPEAR for Assembly 2026"). The wider footprint shows every committee CATHERINE BLAKESPEAR controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.