Electoral receipt · State Senate
LILY MEI
State Senate · SEN-10 · 2022 cycle
Funding Receipt
LILY MEI · 2022 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 823 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $79,144 · 7%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $68,103 · 6%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $984,251 · 87%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Mei, Lily · City of Fremont $20,712
02 California Real Estate Political Action Committee (CREPAC) $19,400
03 ChamberPAC Small Contributor Committee $12,200
04 Yang Shao for Fremont City Council 2 $9,800
05 Yin, C C · McDonalds Inc $9,800
06 Californians for Jobs & Strong Economy $9,800
07 PG&E Corporation $9,800
08 California Apartment Association PAC $9,800
09 Davita $9,800
10 Los Angeles Police Protective League PAC $9,800
11 Western Manufactured Housing Communities Assn. $9,800
12 CALPAC - California Medical Association PAC $9,800
13 Fremont Firefighters Local 1689 PAC $9,800
14 Kao, Peter · Stanford $7,900
15 Mei, Calvin · Student/Intern $7,900
16 Ng, Lawrence · Asian Health Services $7,402
17 Chiu, Herbert · KFC $7,400
18 Hu, Limin · N/a $7,400
19 Mei, Katherine · Amazon $7,400
20 CA Fuels & Convenience Alliance PAC $7,400
21 Gee, Buck · Not Employed $7,400
22 Associated General Contractors Political Action Committee $7,000
23 Mayten Manor Corporation $6,465
24 Rich, Doug · Valley Oak Partners $5,900
25 Dutra Enterprises Inc $5,100
Primary committee total $1,131,498
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Senate in this cycle (e.g. "LILY MEI for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee LILY MEI controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.