Electoral receipt · State Senate
JAMAL KHAN
State Senate · SEN-10 · 2022 cycle
Funding Receipt
JAMAL KHAN · 2022 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 69 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $7,705 · 15%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $6,096 · 12%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $36,700 · 73%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Khan, Reena · Homemaker $4,800
02 Khan, Mahbub · California State University DH $4,770
03 Khan, Marufur · OfficeDepot $4,750
04 Ahmed, Zahed · State of California $4,700
05 Khan, Monika · City of New York $4,700
06 Tuli, Zinia · Intel $4,500
07 Hassanat, Abul · Total Care Rx $3,100
08 Khan, Madhury · Kaiser $2,600
09 Khan, Jamal · Jamal Khan for State Senate 2022 $2,386
10 Sharif, Shadiya · Freelance $2,000
11 Hoque, Enam · In Transition $1,000
12 Rahman, Arifa · Life stance $1,000
13 Sirajullah, Mohammad · Dr. Mohammad Sirajullah Family Medicine $1,000
14 Ahmed, Munir · Freelance $1,000
15 Hossain, Quazi · Retired $1,000
16 Hashem, Abul · M.A Hashem D.D.S $500
17 Hoque, Alimul · Retired $500
18 Syed, Rafia · Dr. Rafia Syed, DDS $500
19 Mamoon, Saif · Caltrans $500
20 Khan, Yasmin · Jackson and Coker (Locum) $500
21 Masood, Khalid · Intelop $300
22 Sarwar, Abu · Delgado Community College $300
23 Siddiqee, Amer · Palo Alto Networks $250
24 NASIR, SAJID · Block, Inc $225
25 Shafquat, Aliya · Freelance $200
Primary committee total $50,501
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Senate in this cycle (e.g. "JAMAL KHAN for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee JAMAL KHAN controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.