Electoral receipt · State Senate
RAFAEL GARCIA JR.
State Senate · SEN-8 · 2022 cycle
Funding Receipt
RAFAEL GARCIA JR. · 2022 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 68 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $10,628 · 46%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $1,955 · 8%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $10,693 · 46%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Garcia, Rafael · AFSCME Council 57 $6,093
02 Ramirez, Carmelita · Mi Beauty Wax $3,908
03 Moll, Ramona · UC Davis $1,261
04 Garcia, Margarita · Aspen dental $1,100
05 Carrasco, Gloria · Merced Union High School District $600
06 Manness, Kathryn · Retired $555
07 Ortiz, Julio · Gaspachos $500
08 M RUBIO JR, VICTOR · Plasma Ruggedized Solutions $480
09 Gutierrez, David · Robla School District $410
10 Rojas, Ericka · Mi Beauty Wax $300
11 Moreno-Rivera, Moises · State of California $300
12 Ludlow, Judy · Retired $300
13 Carrasco, Fernando · Campus Automotive $300
14 Matias, Moises · State of California $300
15 MBW Sacramento, LLC $275
16 Calderon Ruiz, Miguel · Intercare Holdings Inc. $233
17 Calderon, Manuel · eHealth $201
18 Hernandez, Aaron · Stryker $200
19 Cisneros, Eliseo · Treehouse $200
20 Guido, Jesus · FM Industries $200
21 Cruz, Juan · Franklin-McKinley School District $200
22 Dela Cruz, Vernie · Aspiration $200
23 Herrera, Luisa · Foothill De Anza Community College District $200
24 Pulido, Pauline · Envision Rx $200
25 Corral, Miguel · City of hollister $200
Primary committee total $23,276
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Senate in this cycle (e.g. "RAFAEL GARCIA JR. for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee RAFAEL GARCIA JR. controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.