Electoral receipt · State Assembly
SCOTT RHINEHART
State Assembly · ASM-73 · 2020 cycle
Funding Receipt
SCOTT RHINEHART · 2020 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 175 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $30,270 · 24%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $20,500 · 17%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $73,000 · 59%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Planned Parenthood of Orange and San Bernardino Counties Action Fund $9,400
02 California State Council of Laborers PAC $9,300
03 Wise, Steven · Self Employed $4,800
04 WAVE $4,700
05 Canyon Democrats $4,700
06 National Union of Healthcare Workers $4,500
07 Thorburn, Karen · Retired $4,400
08 California Federation of Teachers $3,750
09 Polston, Gary · Self Employed $3,600
10 Thorburn, Andrew · GBG $3,500
11 Garth, Natalie · Unemployed $3,250
12 MIke Levin for Congress $2,700
13 Kritzmire, William · Retired $2,500
14 California Dream PAC $2,500
15 Lavender Democrats $2,371
16 Eastman, Bonnie · DBE Consulting Inc. $2,050
17 Dooley, Jackie · Retired $2,000
18 Baechtold-Moreno, Joseph · Retired $2,000
19 Joshua, Kathleen · Unemployed $1,850
20 Puleo, Robert · Robert Puleo Design, Inc. $1,520
21 Riddle, Lynne · Retired $1,500
22 South Orange County Democratic Club $1,500
23 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers PAC $1,500
24 May, Linda · Linda May $1,300
25 California Democratic Party $1,250
Primary committee total $123,770
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "SCOTT RHINEHART for Assembly 2020"). The wider footprint shows every committee SCOTT RHINEHART controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.