Electoral receipt · State Assembly

BILAL MAHMOOD

State Assembly · ASM-17 · 2022 cycle

Funding Receipt

BILAL MAHMOOD · 2022 cycle

★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★

Raised for this race $1,000,973

Funding mix · 377 unique donors · primary committee

S Small donors (Under $500) $39,274 · 4%

M Medium donors ($500–$999) $34,384 · 3%

L Large donors ($1,000+) $927,316 · 93%

Top donors to primary committee (25 shown)

01 MAHMOOD, BILAL · NONE $597,519

02 AAMER, SAMIRA · NONE $9,800

03 ALSTROMER, GUSTAF · Y COMBINATOR $9,800

04 MAHMOOD, AAMER · GOOGLE $9,800

05 JERSIN, JOHN · THE JERSIN FOUNDATION $9,800

06 JOHNSON, ERICA · THE JERSIN FOUNDATION $9,800

07 YEN, CHRISTINE · HONEYCOMB $5,000

08 GU, SI YAO · COINBASE $4,900

09 CHIU, AMY · DEAR BRIGHTLY $4,900

10 FRENCH-OWEN, CALVIN · Y COMBINATOR $4,900

11 GRABENSTEIN, NICK · OUR NOW TECHNOLOGIES, INC. $4,900

12 KRAMER, SCOTT · AMPLITUDE $4,900

13 LEE, GRANT · GAMMA TECH, INC. $4,900

14 LEE, SANDRA · APOLLO GRAPH, INC. $4,900

15 PAM, ROBIN · STRIPE $4,900

16 SEIBEL, MICHAEL · Y COMBINATOR $4,900

17 SHIRAZI, DARIAN · GOOGLE $4,900

18 SHIRAZI, HILARY · PINTEREST $4,900

19 SISSON, GRETCHEN · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO $4,900

20 ALTMAN, SAM · APOLLO PROJECTS $4,900

21 ROGERS, CINDY · AMPLITUDE $4,900

22 TIULENTINO, JANELLE · TALENTDROP, INC $4,900

23 BAUER, JUSTIN · AMPLITUDE $4,900

24 LIU, CURTIS · AMPLITUDE $4,900

25 WANG, JEFFREY · AMPLITUDE $4,900

Primary committee total $1,000,973

Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology

What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "BILAL MAHMOOD for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee BILAL MAHMOOD controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.