Electoral receipt · State Assembly
PARAMVIR S. BRAR
State Assembly · ASM-67 · 2022 cycle
Funding Receipt
PARAMVIR S. BRAR · 2022 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 48 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $5,719 · 23%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $15,658 · 64%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $3,100 · 13%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Kaur, Ramandeep · Dodgers Logistics Inc $1,200
02 Bassi, Navdeep · Bassi & Sons, Inc. $1,100
03 Chugh, Navneet · Chugh Law Firm $1,000
04 Sandhu, Kamaljit · Macht Inc LLC $1,000
05 Singh, Pardeep · RTC $999
06 Singh, Piara · Retired $999
07 Brar, Mohan · Nizampur Transport Inc. $998
08 Pawar, Satgurjit · Concrete Inspector $995
09 Brar, Gagandeep · Nighthawk Transport LLC. $990
10 Brar, Param · Unemployed $968
11 Tahim, Harpreet · Nighthauler Transport LLC. $950
12 Brar, Gurpreet · Orange County Sheriff Department $950
13 Brar, Sirmor · Retired $925
14 Hansra, Bismaad · UCI $900
15 Singh, Surjit · Toor Farms $600
16 Mehrok, Tejdeep · The Boeing Company $501
17 Mann, Kashmir · K Mann Brothers Inc. $500
18 Brar, Gurmeet · Retired $500
19 Gill, Rajinder · Amit Carrier Inc. $500
20 Marwah, Amarjit · Retired $500
21 Kaur, Gurpreet · UPS $500
22 Bhullar, Sukhchain · Road link carrier $500
23 Singh, Gurinder · Brass transport inc $500
24 Sidhu, Mohinder · Raqba inc $500
25 Hundal, Samittar · Night Hunt LLC $500
Primary committee total $24,477
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "PARAMVIR S. BRAR for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee PARAMVIR S. BRAR controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.