Electoral receipt · State Assembly
JONATHAN ZACHRESON
State Assembly · ASM-05 · 2022 cycle
Funding Receipt
JONATHAN ZACHRESON · 2022 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 44 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $4,725 · 42%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $4,413 · 40%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $2,000 · 18%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Zachreson, Ryan · USPS $2,000
02 Zachreson, Jonathan · Sutter Health $913
03 Lee, Jennifer · DBA: Jennifer Lee $600
04 Combest, Karen · Retired $600
05 Orenstein, Margaret · Retired $500
06 Mason, Jenny · Homemaker $500
07 Cynthia Sarah, Inc. $500
08 Davison, Scott · Davison IP $500
09 Wyagnt, Stephanie · DBA: Stephanie Wyagnt $500
10 Reed, Jay · Wheelhouse Strategies $250
11 Ladd, Lisa · Williams Tri County Real Estate $250
12 Tennis, Matthew · DBA: Matthew Tennis $250
13 Kuznetsov, Ivan · Google $250
14 Mistry, Suverna · DBA: Suverna Mistry $200
15 Kelly, Michele · UC Irvine $200
16 Phillips, Chemene · Brixbranding $200
17 Peterson, Michael · DBA: Michelle & Michael Peterson $200
18 Keller, Heather · Retired $125
19 Creedon, Michael · Airline $100
20 Kannady, Lauren · Sutter Health $100
21 Merrifield, Ginny · Retired $100
22 ODonnell, Kevin · Netsculptures $100
23 Rosenkranz, Laura · Sage Oak $100
24 Mcdunn, Dan · McDunn Construction, Inc. $100
25 Khatibi, Azadeh · Retired $100
Primary committee total $11,138
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "JONATHAN ZACHRESON for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee JONATHAN ZACHRESON controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.