Electoral receipt · State Assembly
STEVE SCHWARTZ
State Assembly · ASM-12 · 2022 cycle
Funding Receipt
STEVE SCHWARTZ · 2022 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 212 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $27,341 · 27%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $19,787 · 20%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $53,386 · 53%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Squire, Mark · Good Earth Natural Foods $4,900
02 Felton, Mary · n/a $4,900
03 Parish, Julie · n/a $4,900
04 Parish, Will · n/a $4,900
05 California Certified Organic Farmers (CCOF) Action Fund $4,000
06 Dimock, Michael · Public Health Institute $3,228
07 Vailetti, Marco · Marco Vialetti $2,875
08 Martin, Larry · n/a $2,800
09 Fleming, Severine V T · Severine V T Fleming $2,000
10 Friedman, Robert · The Corporation for Enterprise Development (CFED) $2,000
11 Montague, John · Scope Dog, LLC $2,000
12 Stein, Marlene W. · n/a $1,800
13 Dahan, Omri · n/a $1,800
14 Silberstein, Stephen M. · n/a $1,408
15 Binder, Ruth Ann · Ruth Ann Binder $1,000
16 Schwartz, Elizabeth · n/a $1,000
17 Arrowsmith, Shelley · n/a $1,000
18 Merhav, Ehud · Energy Orbit $1,000
19 Rusch, Derek M. · Derek Rusch Building $1,000
20 Siegle, Alan · Sonoma Compost $1,000
21 Weber, Warren T. · n/a $1,000
22 Wechsler, David · Accord Associates, LLC $1,000
23 Weinstein, John · Check Agencies of California, Inc. $1,000
24 Wilcox, Josiah N. · n/a $1,000
25 Abeles, Keith D. · Sonoma Resource Conservation District $1,000
Primary committee total $100,514
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "STEVE SCHWARTZ for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee STEVE SCHWARTZ controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.