Electoral receipt · State Assembly
GISELLE HALE
State Assembly · ASM-21 · 2022 cycle
Funding Receipt
GISELLE HALE · 2022 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 467 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $37,742 · 5%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $38,650 · 5%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $734,427 · 91%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Beacon Media, LLC $11,000
02 Doyle, Kathryn · n/a $9,800
03 Handisides, Trista · Meta $9,800
04 Hudson, Kristin · n/a $9,800
05 Marc Berman for Assembly 2022 $9,800
06 Pimentel, Jacquelyn · 1000ADU $9,800
07 Rusenko, David · Square, Inc. $9,800
08 Schultz, Alexander · Meta $9,800
09 Sutherland, Andrew · n/a $9,800
10 Weekly, David · Medcorder $9,800
11 Zappacosta, Marco · Thumbtack $9,800
12 Zhuo, Julie · Sundial $9,800
13 Landau, Rachel · Allure $9,800
14 Chudnovsky, Stan · Meta, Inc. $9,800
15 Herman, Cipora · LA28 $9,800
16 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 617 PAC $9,800
17 Rajaram, Gokul · DoorDash $9,800
18 Rosenthal, Eugenie · n/a $9,800
19 Russell, Kenneth · Cisco Systems $9,800
20 Shroff, Rajat · Doordash $9,800
21 Sgi Retail, LLC $9,800
22 California Teachers Association/Association for Better Citizenship Small Contributor Committee $9,700
23 State Building and Construction Trades Council of California PAC Small Contributor Committee $9,700
24 Briggs, Gary · n/a $7,350
25 Jensen, Jessica · Indeed $7,000
Primary committee total $810,819
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "GISELLE HALE for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee GISELLE HALE controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.