Electoral receipt · State Assembly
TRI TA
State Assembly · ASM-70 · 2024 cycle
Funding Receipt
TRI TA · 2024 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 322 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $24,294 · 3%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $24,450 · 3%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $740,795 · 94%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 California Real Estate PAC, CREPAC $21,800
02 State Building & Construction Trades Council of CA $21,800
03 LA/OC Building & Construction Trades Council $15,000
04 Pechanga Band of Indians $11,000
05 Phillips 66 Company $11,000
06 San Manuel Band of Mission Indians $11,000
07 Steel, Shawn · Self $11,000
08 Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians $11,000
09 Western Manufactured Housing Communities Assoc $11,000
10 Chevron $11,000
11 DaVita $11,000
12 Gallagher for Assembly 2024 $11,000
13 The Lincoln Club of Orange County $11,000
14 Valero Services, Inc $11,000
15 Orange County Professional Firefighters Assoc $11,000
16 The Gardens Casino $11,000
17 Ca State Council of Laborers $10,900
18 CRC Services LLC(Maria Spencer) $10,000
19 McDonalds $10,000
20 California Professional Firefighters PAC $9,750
21 ChamberPAC Small Contributor Committee $9,500
22 Fresenius Medical Care $9,500
23 California Correctional Peace Officers Association PAC $9,000
24 California New Car Dealers Association PAC $9,000
25 Signal Hill Petroleum Inc. $8,000
Primary committee total $789,539
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "TRI TA for Assembly 2024"). The wider footprint shows every committee TRI TA controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.