PublicReceiptBeta
Electoral receipt · State Assembly

JUAN CARRILLO

State Assembly · ASM-39 · 2026 cycle

Funding Receipt
JUAN CARRILLO · 2026 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Raised for this race $862,022
Funding mix · 208 unique donors · primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $2,584 · 0%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $5,977 · 1%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $853,462 · 99%
Where the money comes from
67% from named interests
What this means →
Sort by
InterestAmountShareGiftsDonors
Candidate / party transfers$244K28%85
Other organizations (unclassified)unattributable$214K25%9786
Individuals (no industry data disclosed)unattributable$72K8%2623
Tribal governments / gaming$55K6%1510
Building trades / construction labor$50K6%1312
Energy & utilities$46K5%1410
Healthcare / pharma / medical$28K3%1110
Real estate & development$28K3%75
Other named interests
7 categories below 1%: Finance & banking, Agriculture, Other labor unions, Engineers & scientists (public), Legal / trial lawyers, Nurses & healthcare workers, Gaming / sports betting
$28K3%2218
Teachers & education$27K3%54
Construction & contractors$24K3%117
Public safety (police/fire)$21K2%1310
Business & trade groups$18K2%33
Entertainment & media$9K1%65

Headline excludes self-funding and the unattributable individuals bucket — gifts from people for whom employer/occupation either isn't disclosed (Cal-Access leaves it blank on roughly 85% of individual contributions) or doesn't fit any sector category. Named interests below 1% of total raised collapse into a single "Other named interests" row to keep the long tail legible; the rolled-up category names are listed inline beneath that row. See the methodology for the classifier rules and the two distinct reasons a gift becomes unattributable.

Top donors to primary committee (25 shown)
01 Juan Carrillo for Assembly 2024 $228,700
02 California Apartment Association PAC $11,800
03 Morongo Band of Mission Indians $11,800
04 Pechanga Band of Indians $11,800
05 Phillips 66 $11,800
06 California Teachers Association/Association for Better Citizenship $11,800
07 California Construction & Industrial Materials Association PAC $11,244
08 California Real Estate Political Action Committee (CREPAC) - California Association of Realtors $10,800
09 Leticia Gonzalez for Assembly 2026 $10,529
10 Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake (HPUL) Project Operations $8,500
11 Hernandez, Jose · IDEATE California $7,900
12 State Building & Construction Trades Council of CA PAC $6,000
13 Airbnb Inc. $5,900
14 Amarok Ultimate Perimeter Security $5,900
15 Assn of California School Administrators PAC $5,900
16 AT&T Services Inc. and its Affiliates $5,900
17 CA State Council of Laborers PAC - SCC $5,900
18 California Hospital Association PAC, Sponsored by CAHHS $5,900
19 California New Car Dealers Assoc. PAC $5,900
20 CEMEX Materials LLC $5,900
21 Doctors Company PAC (aka DOCPAC) $5,900
22 Faculty for our University's Future, a cmte sponsored by the CA Faculty Assn. $5,900
23 Quillin, Patty · Homemaker $5,900
24 Simons, Elizabeth · Retired $5,900
25 Western Manufactured Housing Communities Assn. PAC $5,900
Primary committee total $862,022
Wider fundraising footprint · primary is 91% of total controlled
CARRILLO FOR ASSEMBLY 2026; JUAN · Primary campaign committee $862,022
CARRILLO'S BALLOT MEASURE COMMITTEE; LEADING CALIFORNIA: JUAN · Ballot-measure / leadership PAC $88,445
All controlled committees $950,466
Where the non-primary money goes
$$ Ballot-measure / leadership PAC $88,445
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology

What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "JUAN CARRILLO for Assembly 2026"). The wider footprint shows every committee JUAN CARRILLO controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.