LOLA SMALLWOOD-CUEVAS
State Senate · SEN-28 · 2026 cycle
| Interest | Amount | Share | Gifts | Donors |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other organizations (unclassified)unattributable | $105K | 20% | 69 | 61 |
| Building trades / construction labor | $103K | 19% | 36 | 27 |
| Other labor unions | $93K | 18% | 27 | 20 |
| Individuals (no industry data disclosed)unattributable | $66K | 12% | 126 | 99 |
| Teachers & education | $25K | 5% | 9 | 5 |
| Healthcare / pharma / medical | $24K | 4% | 14 | 10 |
| Nurses & healthcare workers | $18K | 3% | 9 | 2 |
| Tribal governments / gaming | $18K | 3% | 7 | 6 |
| Legal / trial lawyers | $14K | 3% | 22 | 21 |
| Public safety (police/fire) | $14K | 3% | 6 | 1 |
| Gaming / sports betting | $14K | 3% | 8 | 3 |
| Finance & banking | $11K | 2% | 2 | 2 |
| Entertainment & media | $10K | 2% | 11 | 8 |
| Other named interests 4 categories below 1%: Energy & utilities, Business & trade groups, Engineers & scientists (public), Construction & contractors | $9K | 2% | 7 | 5 |
| Real estate & development | $6K | 1% | 6 | 6 |
| Candidate / party transfers | $350 | 0% | 1 | 1 |
Headline excludes self-funding and the unattributable individuals bucket — gifts from people for whom employer/occupation either isn't disclosed (Cal-Access leaves it blank on roughly 85% of individual contributions) or doesn't fit any sector category. Named interests below 1% of total raised collapse into a single "Other named interests" row to keep the long tail legible; the rolled-up category names are listed inline beneath that row. See the methodology for the classifier rules and the two distinct reasons a gift becomes unattributable.
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Senate in this cycle (e.g. "LOLA SMALLWOOD-CUEVAS for Assembly 2026"). The wider footprint shows every committee LOLA SMALLWOOD-CUEVAS controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.