Electoral receipt · State Assembly
KIMBERLY HO
State Assembly · ASM-70 · 2022 cycle
Funding Receipt
KIMBERLY HO · 2022 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 64 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) -$8,220 · -2%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $6,850 · 1%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $492,600 · 100%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Ho, Kimberly · Kimberly Skin, Inc. $403,000
02 Nguyen, VanAnh · Northrop Grumman $9,800
03 Seid, Daniel · Beach Dermato Therapy $9,800
04 Pham, Kim Khue · n/a $4,900
05 Trinh, Ty · J & R Video Games $4,900
06 Pham, John · n/a $4,900
07 Kemp, Khiry · Oppti $4,900
08 Nguyen, Anhkhoa · Northrop Grumman $4,600
09 Vo, Lucia · Northrop Grumman $4,500
10 Nguyen, Anhvu · Zymo Research $4,200
11 Hoang, Tung · Golden West Food Group $3,900
12 Pham, Holly Huong · Katella Nails & Spa $3,500
13 Nguyen, Anhminh · Northrop Grumman $3,100
14 Passion Design and Services, Inc. $3,000
15 Bridgecreek Realty Investment Corp. $2,000
16 Cal City Construction, Inc. $2,000
17 Truong, Au · n/a $2,000
18 Dennis Dillon Auto Park & Truck Center, Inc. $1,100
19 Hoang, Kenny · n/a $1,000
20 Tran, Ha · Coastline Community College $1,000
21 Montez, Zackariah · Callaway Golf $850
22 Apartment Association of Orange County PAC $500
23 Creative Outdoor Advertising $500
24 Shah, Syed · Best Western Hotel $500
25 Wagstaff-Kuster, Ursula · CBA, Inc. $500
Primary committee total $491,230
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "KIMBERLY HO for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee KIMBERLY HO controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.