Electoral receipt · State Assembly
ROBERT CANCIO
State Assembly · ASM-64 · 2022 cycle
Funding Receipt
ROBERT CANCIO · 2022 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 23 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $1,200 · 1%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $3,500 · 2%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $155,258 · 97%
Top donors to primary committee
(23)
01 Cancio, Jr, Roberto · Candidate $142,305
02 He, Danny · Soapbox, Inc $4,900
03 Bulletin Displays, LLC(Mark Kudler) $3,054
04 Burke, Ryan W. · Approved Transportation & Warehousing, LTD $1,000
05 Espinoza, Denise · n/a $1,000
06 Infanzon, Bianca · University of Southern California $1,000
07 Juarez, Rosario · Ancon Marine $1,000
08 Thompson, Sandra · n/a $1,000
09 Partamian, Cynthia · n/a $500
10 Phan, Jennifer · Jennifer Phan $500
11 Salazar, Michael · Contract $500
12 Orange County Victory Fund State $500
13 Peter Dames Insurance $500
14 Reliable Group Property Management Services, Inc. $500
15 Albert, Ana · The Los Angeles Queen of Angels Foundation, Inc. $500
16 Jauregui, Martha · Norwalk- La Mirada USD $250
17 Magana, Alma · Alma Magana $250
18 Maldonado, Angelo Gandalf · La Mirada Volunteer Center $200
19 Dela Cruz, Jellica Anne · USC $100
20 Alvarez, Catherine R. · n/a $100
21 Frometa, Nolveris · Kaiser Permanente $100
22 Gomez, Lissa · n/a $100
23 Shryock, Leonard · Norwalk La Mirada USD $100
Primary committee total $159,958
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "ROBERT CANCIO for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee ROBERT CANCIO controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.