Electoral receipt · State Senate
SEYDI ALEJANDRA MORALES
State Senate · SEN-20 · 2022 cycle
Funding Receipt
SEYDI ALEJANDRA MORALES · 2022 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 71 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $7,725 · 14%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $9,875 · 18%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $36,606 · 68%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Walt Design $4,306
02 Edwin Haronian MD Inc. $4,000
03 Pilavjyan, Avo · Avo Pilavjyan $4,000
04 Gonzalez, Jessica · Wells Fargo $3,600
05 WWJD Integrity Inc. $3,000
06 Mid-Wilshire Management Inc $3,000
07 Patrick, Bryon · None $2,800
08 Sunset Auto Repair, Inc. $2,200
09 Toledo, Seydi · WWJD Integrity, Inc. $1,900
10 Martinez III, Ray · Advanced Bionics $1,500
11 Acosta Law Office William A Acosta, ESQ. $1,000
12 Gonzalez, Jesus · None $1,000
13 Perez, Martin · Perez Bros Trucking $1,000
14 Williamson, Elsa · Educational Organization $1,000
15 De La Torre, Manuel · Manuel De La Torre $1,000
16 Kennedy, Donny · Self Employed $1,000
17 Marquez, Alma · Del Sol Group $1,000
18 Perez, Jesus · Jesus Perez $950
19 Kohanim Chiropractic, Inc. $950
20 8one8 Brewing, LLC(Bryan Olson) $925
21 Agredano, Lucia · Lucia Agredano $900
22 Globe Capital LLC(Michael Finkle) $900
23 Atlas Auto Body Inc. $800
24 Latinas Lead California $750
25 Gichuiri, Patrick · Apple Inc. $700
Primary committee total $54,206
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Senate in this cycle (e.g. "SEYDI ALEJANDRA MORALES for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee SEYDI ALEJANDRA MORALES controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.