Electoral receipt · State Assembly
EMILY HILBARD
State Assembly · ASM-70 · 2022 cycle
Funding Receipt
EMILY HILBARD · 2022 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 32 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $4,278 · 15%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $2,859 · 10%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $21,779 · 75%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Hibard, Harold · Retired $4,900
02 Hibard, Sarah L. · Retired $4,000
03 Hibard, George · Retired $3,879
04 Lyons, Karen · Unemployeed $3,618
05 Harris, Bruce · Bakken Land Services $2,500
06 Novarro, Steve · Hoving Home $2,000
07 Jones, Amy · Department of Public Safety $1,000
08 Roobian, Jan · Roobian & Company $1,000
09 Hibard, Summer · Spiral $861
10 Barron, Darci · SPT $760
11 Bolles, Jonathan · Confluence Health $500
12 McGowan, Juleene · St. Joseph's Hospital $500
13 Mendoza, Esther · Retired $450
14 Gardner, Cynthia · Retired $300
15 Schulz, Anna · Revive Counseling Group $300
16 Fiore, Denise · Retired $250
17 Reidy, James · Retired $250
18 Ballentine, Monica · Retired $200
19 Mello, Janet · Retired $200
20 Karavedas, Nick · Aquinas High School $198
21 Barnes, Christine · Retired $150
22 Amerson, Kristine · Kristine Amerson $100
23 Bowman-Ochoa, Rebecca L · Retired $100
24 Epperson, Brenda · Retired $100
25 Erickson, Melisa · Newport Mesa unified $100
Primary committee total $28,916
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "EMILY HILBARD for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee EMILY HILBARD controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.