Electoral receipt · State Assembly
SIAKA MASSAQUOI
State Assembly · ASM-43 · 2022 cycle
Funding Receipt
SIAKA MASSAQUOI · 2022 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 42 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $6,578 · 38%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $1,537 · 9%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $9,020 · 53%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Olmstead, Cynthia · None $4,900
02 Young, Charlotte $2,876
03 Make CA Great(Rachel Gunther) $1,244
04 Schwartz, Alan · Schwartz Insurance $518
05 Sarkisyan, Mary · None $518
06 Melendez, Rudy · NBCUniversal $509
07 Castillo, Doris · Federal Reserve Bank $500
08 Gipson, Patrick Lee · County of Los Angeles $269
09 Vogel, Torrey · Self Employed - No Separate Business Name $259
10 Henderson, Tracy · Tracy Henderson $259
11 Kilpatrick, RJ · None $259
12 Hurt, Susannah · Hurt Household $250
13 Hopkins-Young, Deborah · None $250
14 Cole, Dana · Self-Employed- No Separate Business Name $250
15 Robertson, Aubrey · Thrivent Financial Holdings Inc $250
16 Rogovin, Jarrow · Jarrow LLC $250
17 Bolog, David · Los Angeles Department of Water and Power $250
18 Schwartz, Duke · Schwartz Insurance $250
19 Pugh, Beau · Pugh Concessions, Inc $250
20 Huang, Charlene · Self Employed - No Separate Business Name $208
21 Thummel, Wendy · None $204
22 Hegge, Virginia · None $200
23 Smerling, Howard · None $200
24 Maher, Halla · None $200
25 Fox-Yoder, Kimberly · None $172
Primary committee total $17,134
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "SIAKA MASSAQUOI for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee SIAKA MASSAQUOI controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.