PublicReceiptBeta
Electoral receipt · State Assembly

TED K. NORDBLUM

State Assembly · ASM-42 · 2022 cycle

Funding Receipt
TED K. NORDBLUM · 2022 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Raised for this race $38,492
Funding mix · 39 unique donors · primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $3,200 · 8%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $6,000 · 16%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $29,292 · 76%
Top donors to primary committee (25 shown)
01 Nordblum, Ted · Titan Medical DME, Inc $12,392
02 Hopkins, William · Odyssey Investment Partners $4,900
03 Byrd, Ronald · Retired $4,500
04 Stump, Gregory · Owner Lurger Company $1,500
05 Crossan, Eileen · Retired $1,500
06 Crossan, Gary · Retired $1,500
07 Byrd, John · Retired $1,000
08 Kaufman, Richard · Yale Management Services, Inc $1,000
09 RHB RE Corp $1,000
10 Smith, Steve · Steve Smith Insurance Company $1,000
11 Corbett, James · Retired $750
12 Herrera, Kenneth · Southern California Edison $500
13 Hutten, Robert · Westlake Private Wealth Management $500
14 Prete, Ric · Coldwell Banker $500
15 Sullivan, Andy · Canvas Services, LLC $500
16 Andresen, Larry · Retired $500
17 Waldrep, Donald · DBA: Donald Waldrep $500
18 Waldrep, Lisa · DBA: Lisa Waldrep $500
19 Inglis, Cassie · DBA: Cassie Inglis $500
20 Mosler, Larry · Mosler and co. $500
21 OConnell, Judith · Retired $300
22 Cappi, Ronald · DBA: Ronald Cappi $250
23 Modena, Inc. $250
24 Arrasmith, Darin · DBA: Darin Arrasmith $250
25 Inglis, Susan · Retired $250
Primary committee total $38,492
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology

What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "TED K. NORDBLUM for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee TED K. NORDBLUM controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.