Electoral receipt · State Senate
AMNON SHOR
State Senate · SEN-14 · 2022 cycle
Funding Receipt
AMNON SHOR · 2022 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 50 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $5,850 · 15%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $2,500 · 6%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $31,800 · 79%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Spencer, Karen · S'Loreia $4,900
02 Spencer, Richard · Spencer Enterpises $4,900
03 California United Water Coalition $3,800
04 Lewison, Michael · Mdwel $2,500
05 DeFrancesco Enterprises LLC $2,000
06 Perez, Benjamin · El Molino Mexican Imports $1,500
07 Chyan, Janet · Cadence Design $1,200
08 Castanos, Kathryn · Retired $1,000
09 Dayan, Helen · H Dayan Diamonds and Co. $1,000
10 A-1 Lock & Key $1,000
11 Alterman, Polly · Yosemite Church $1,000
12 Weil, Stuart · Blue Lobster Farms $1,000
13 Auburn Manor Holding Corporation $1,000
14 Guzman, Christopher · Pge $1,000
15 Mays, Belva · Retired $1,000
16 Voje, LLC $1,000
17 Cardella, Michelle · Firebaugh Las Deltas Unified School District $1,000
18 Stephens, Elizabeth · Retired $1,000
19 Ginder, Debra · Ginder Developments $1,000
20 Thomasson, Barbara · Retired $750
21 Alia Corporation $500
22 Clark, Norman · Retired $500
23 Draayer, Gerald · Gerald Draayer $500
24 Siegal, Barry · Vision for Israel $500
25 Paloutzian, James · Retired $350
Primary committee total $40,150
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Senate in this cycle (e.g. "AMNON SHOR for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee AMNON SHOR controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.