Electoral receipt · State Assembly
LETICIA CASTILLO
State Assembly · ASM-58 · 2024 cycle
Funding Receipt
LETICIA CASTILLO · 2024 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 109 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $13,989 · 15%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $5,000 · 5%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $76,997 · 80%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Essayli for Assembly 2024 $8,000
02 Diane Dixon For Assembly 2024 $6,000
03 Galllagher for Assembly 2024 $5,500
04 Supporters of Chad Bianco for Sheriff and Coroner $5,500
05 Association, Riverside County Sheriff $5,500
06 Global Processing Systems, Inc. $5,000
07 Tovali, Jessica · Chino Unified $5,000
08 Antal, Katalin · None $4,897
09 Gallagher For Assembly 2024 $3,000
10 Essayli for Assembley 2024 $3,000
11 Golden Together PAC $2,600
12 Robinson, Steve · None $2,500
13 Joe Patterson for Assembly 2024 $2,500
14 California Waste Recycling Association $2,500
15 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers $2,500
16 Eureka PAC $2,000
17 Sanchez for Assembly 2024 $1,500
18 and Company, Fieldstead $1,500
19 Martin, Lara · Alvord School $1,200
20 Patterson for Assebly 2022 $1,000
21 Onusz, Austin · No Business Name $1,000
22 Cordova, Lisa · PHP Agency $1,000
23 Kowell, Robert · Retired $1,000
24 Assembly 2024, Diane Dixon for $1,000
25 for State Senate 2026, Alvarado-Gil $1,000
Primary committee total $95,986
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "LETICIA CASTILLO for Assembly 2024"). The wider footprint shows every committee LETICIA CASTILLO controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.