PublicReceiptBeta
Electoral receipt · State Assembly

VERONICA VARGAS

State Assembly · ASM-13 · 2022 cycle

Funding Receipt
VERONICA VARGAS · 2022 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Raised for this race $60,100
Funding mix · 49 unique donors · primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $4,050 · 7%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $5,600 · 9%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $50,450 · 84%
Top donors to primary committee (25 shown)
01 Singh, Prabhjot · Raja Chandi Group Inc. $4,900
02 Chahal, Surjit · DBA; Surjit Chahal $4,900
03 Kaur, Pushpinder · Arthritis and Rheumatism $4,900
04 Bansal, Sanjeev · Emergency Healthcare $4,000
05 The California Women's List $3,000
06 D. S. Trucking LLC. $2,500
07 Bajwa, Randeep · DBA; Dr. Randeep Bajwa $2,500
08 Cortese, Stephen · Cortese Investment Company $2,500
09 Phelan Properties LLC $2,500
10 Singh, Deep · DBA; Deep Singh Carrier Company $2,500
11 Haugen, David · DBA: David Haugen $2,450
12 Shadow Cargo $2,000
13 Singh, Charnjit · DBA; Charnjit Singh $2,000
14 Shea Homes LP $2,000
15 Eden Enterprises Inc $1,500
16 Veronica Vargas for City Council $1,300
17 Mitracos, Mary · DBA; Mary Mitracos $1,000
18 Susan Eggman for Lieutenant Governor 2026 $1,000
19 Chahal, Paul · DBA; Paul Chahal $1,000
20 Ghai, Charanjit · Ghai Mgmt Services Inc $1,000
21 AMD Food Services Inc. $1,000
22 Malla Express Inc $1,000
23 Shahi, Jasvir · Byron Corners Inc $1,000
24 Persuade Public Relations $1,000
25 Country Mart Gas & Food $500
Primary committee total $60,100
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology

What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "VERONICA VARGAS for Assembly 2022"). The wider footprint shows every committee VERONICA VARGAS controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.