Electoral receipt · State Senate
ELIZABETH W AHLERS
State Senate · SEN-25 · 2024 cycle
Funding Receipt
ELIZABETH W AHLERS · 2024 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 283 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $54,783 · 18%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $28,534 · 9%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $224,100 · 73%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Ahlers, Elizabeth · Crescenta Valley Town Council $100,000
02 Russell, Keitha · Russell Properties Management Inc $11,000
03 Chung, Edwin · Broadcom $9,500
04 Mak, Gilbert K. K. · Dr. Mak Dental Corp $8,000
05 Brian Jones for Lt. Governor 2026 $6,500
06 Suter, Karen S. · None $6,300
07 Li, Kar Yee · Yee Major Productions $5,500
08 America Upheld-California $5,500
09 Haley, James · Retired $5,500
10 Miyake, Rickie · Retired $5,075
11 Tan, Mary · Retired $5,000
12 Zero One Interactive $4,000
13 Reese, Dran · Salt & Light Council $3,500
14 Bohot, Linda K. · None $3,500
15 Kan, Wen · Expert Computer $3,500
16 Patriot View LLC - Bob McDowell $3,150
17 Cates, David · Catesgarb Holdings $3,000
18 Baron, Michael · Michael Baron $2,875
19 Ahn, Che · Harvest Rock Church $2,600
20 Wong, Pina · Pina Wong, MD $2,600
21 Ahn, Sue · Harvest Rock Church $2,500
22 Yang, Min · Bakery Depot Supplies,Inc. $2,350
23 Weigel, Nancy J. · Ripe for Harvest $2,330
24 Hoyer, Robert · Delphi Business $2,280
25 Asia Sky Media LLC - Dennis Lam $2,265
Primary committee total $307,417
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Senate in this cycle (e.g. "ELIZABETH W AHLERS for Assembly 2024"). The wider footprint shows every committee ELIZABETH W AHLERS controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.