Electoral receipt · State Assembly
ELIZABETH W AHLERS
State Assembly · ASM-40 · 2026 cycle
Funding Receipt
ELIZABETH W AHLERS · 2026 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 26 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $1,605 · 3%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $3,300 · 6%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $50,928 · 91%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Chung, Edwin · Broadcom Corp $11,800
02 Chung, Grace · Retired $11,800
03 Mak, Gilbert · Dr. Gilbert K. Mak, DDS $5,900
04 Miyake, Rickie · Retired $5,900
05 Wiefferink, Gehard · Clay Lacy Aviation $4,000
06 Lee, Sonia · Thompson Von Tungeln $2,500
07 Niemi, Ryley · NIMI Canvassing $2,028
08 Ahlers, Victoria · Tea Rose Garden $2,000
09 Grewal, Harleen · Harleen Grewal, DDS $2,000
10 Jung, Carolyn · Retired $2,000
11 Bohot, Linda · Retired $1,000
12 Suter, Karen · Retired $700
13 Greig, Celeste · Retired $600
14 Cypress Street Partners LLC $500
15 De La Cruz, Roberto · Rad House Bolting $500
16 Hoyer, Robert · Cypress Street Partners $500
17 Lai-Sin Mak, Julie · Retired $500
18 Intuit $330
19 Cintron, William · Cameron Energy Services Corp $325
20 Weigel, Nancy · Retired $300
21 White, Mark · GEM Mortgage $200
22 Somoza, Fern · Retired $150
23 Price, Janet · Volunteer/ Founder $100
24 Tatone, Patty · Retired $100
25 Young, Michael · Collectors Editions.com $100
Primary committee total $55,833
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "ELIZABETH W AHLERS for Assembly 2026"). The wider footprint shows every committee ELIZABETH W AHLERS controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.