DARSHANA R PATEL
State Assembly · ASM-76 · 2026 cycle
| Interest | Amount | Share | Gifts | Donors |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate / party transfers | $525K | 42% | 85 | 52 |
| Other organizations (unclassified)unattributable | $182K | 15% | 91 | 76 |
| Individuals (no industry data disclosed)unattributable | $125K | 10% | 185 | 130 |
| Healthcare / pharma / medical | $89K | 7% | 49 | 29 |
| Other named interests 6 categories below 1%: Finance & banking, Nurses & healthcare workers, Business & trade groups, Energy & utilities, Gaming / sports betting, Engineers & scientists (public) | $47K | 4% | 33 | 17 |
| Tribal governments / gaming | $43K | 3% | 13 | 9 |
| Teachers & education | $41K | 3% | 6 | 5 |
| Other labor unions | $33K | 3% | 7 | 6 |
| Legal / trial lawyers | $30K | 2% | 27 | 23 |
| Entertainment & media | $30K | 2% | 12 | 7 |
| Public safety (police/fire) | $28K | 2% | 14 | 8 |
| Building trades / construction labor | $24K | 2% | 5 | 5 |
| Construction & contractors | $19K | 2% | 8 | 3 |
| Real estate & development | $16K | 1% | 11 | 4 |
| Agriculture | $14K | 1% | 8 | 7 |
Headline excludes self-funding and the unattributable individuals bucket — gifts from people for whom employer/occupation either isn't disclosed (Cal-Access leaves it blank on roughly 85% of individual contributions) or doesn't fit any sector category. Named interests below 1% of total raised collapse into a single "Other named interests" row to keep the long tail legible; the rolled-up category names are listed inline beneath that row. See the methodology for the classifier rules and the two distinct reasons a gift becomes unattributable.
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "DARSHANA R PATEL for Assembly 2026"). The wider footprint shows every committee DARSHANA R PATEL controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.