PublicReceiptBeta
Electoral receipt · State Assembly

STEVE PIERSON

State Assembly · ASM-44 · 2024 cycle

Funding Receipt
STEVE PIERSON · 2024 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Raised for this race $204,430
Funding mix · 453 unique donors · primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $68,471 · 33%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $30,059 · 15%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $105,900 · 52%
Top donors to primary committee (25 shown)
01 Malley, Nyna · Not-Employed $11,000
02 Malley, Robert · Pierbridge Inc. $11,000
03 California Teachers Association - Association for Better Citizenship $10,900
04 Dalton, Shawna · Shawna Dalton $5,500
05 Pierson, Shirley · Not-Employed $5,500
06 Laurance, Dale · Not-Employed $5,000
07 Foster, Donald · Not-Employed $4,550
08 Ballon, John · Concept Arts $3,500
09 Frost, Elizabeth · H2a International $3,500
10 Jankowsky, Joel · Not-Employed $3,000
11 Records, George · Reitred $3,000
12 Whitesides, George · George Whitesides $3,000
13 PrivacyPAC $3,000
14 Begley, Ed · Ed Begley $2,700
15 Malley, James · Beneship LLC $2,600
16 Drachkovitch, Radoye · 44 Blue Productions $2,500
17 Fabian, Patrick · Patrick Fabian $2,500
18 Malley, Rachel · Ty Allan Jackson LLC $2,500
19 Quinn, Susanna · Not-Employed $1,750
20 Sheu, Susan · Susan Sheu $1,600
21 Letscher, Matt · Not-Employed $1,550
22 Jackson, Linda · Linda Jackson $1,500
23 Sie, James · James Sie $1,467
24 Urquizu, Estela · Not-Employed $1,300
25 Cendejas, Danielle · The Strategy Group $1,250
Primary committee total $204,430
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology

What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "STEVE PIERSON for Assembly 2024"). The wider footprint shows every committee STEVE PIERSON controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.