Electoral receipt · State Assembly
JESSICA MALDONADO
State Assembly · ASM-66 · 2026 cycle
Funding Receipt
JESSICA MALDONADO · 2026 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 78 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $16,906 · 32%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $3,972 · 7%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $32,424 · 61%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Saruwatari, Darcie · Retired $6,326
02 Saruwatari, Ken N. · Retired $5,900
03 Slaughter, Tanisha · Veterans Affairs $4,750
04 Wiltfong, Jean · Retired $4,462
05 Shim, Sora · Digital Archiving Systems $3,556
06 Goya, Debbie · Debbie Goya OD $3,500
07 Krall, Terri · Northrop Grumman $2,592
08 Pollock, Robert · Pivital Inc $1,816
09 Leach, Deb · Douglas J. Leach, Architects, Inc. $1,500
10 Johnson, Eric · Retired $1,232
11 Emory, Stephen · Retired $1,060
12 Morales, Ruben · Everyones Garage $1,000
13 Agerbeek, David · Retired $1,000
14 Schilling, Mark · Retired $1,000
15 Shannon, Dale · Fulfill Your Dream $707
16 Nichols, William · Booz Allen Hamilton $700
17 3V Signs & Graphics LLC $688
18 Takaki, Donna C. · None $500
19 Greig, Celeste · Retired $500
20 Goldbach, Eric · Retired $500
21 Gendler, Anita · Retired $450
22 Bray, Mary · Providence Hospital Torrance $426
23 DiMaggio, Erin · None $381
24 Crawford, Joy · Retired $342
25 Iiyama, Luz · Retired $310
Primary committee total $53,302
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "JESSICA MALDONADO for Assembly 2026"). The wider footprint shows every committee JESSICA MALDONADO controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.