LA SHAE N SHARP-COLLINS
State Assembly · ASM-79 · 2026 cycle
| Interest | Amount | Share | Gifts | Donors |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthcare / pharma / medical | $58K | 14% | 28 | 17 |
| Individuals (no industry data disclosed)unattributable | $58K | 14% | 57 | 46 |
| Other organizations (unclassified)unattributable | $57K | 14% | 34 | 28 |
| Teachers & education | $34K | 8% | 4 | 3 |
| Legal / trial lawyers | $32K | 8% | 20 | 17 |
| Other labor unions | $30K | 7% | 6 | 5 |
| Building trades / construction labor | $28K | 7% | 9 | 6 |
| Tribal governments / gaming | $27K | 6% | 9 | 6 |
| Business & trade groups | $21K | 5% | 5 | 3 |
| Energy & utilities | $19K | 4% | 6 | 3 |
| Real estate & development | $12K | 3% | 6 | 5 |
| Nurses & healthcare workers | $10K | 2% | 6 | 2 |
| Gaming / sports betting | $9K | 2% | 3 | 2 |
| Finance & banking | $7K | 2% | 6 | 5 |
| Construction & contractors | $6K | 1% | 5 | 5 |
| Other named interests 2 categories below 1%: Public safety (police/fire), Engineers & scientists (public) | $6K | 1% | 5 | 2 |
| Entertainment & media | $5K | 1% | 3 | 2 |
| Candidate / party transfers | $620 | 0% | 1 | 1 |
Headline excludes self-funding and the unattributable individuals bucket — gifts from people for whom employer/occupation either isn't disclosed (Cal-Access leaves it blank on roughly 85% of individual contributions) or doesn't fit any sector category. Named interests below 1% of total raised collapse into a single "Other named interests" row to keep the long tail legible; the rolled-up category names are listed inline beneath that row. See the methodology for the classifier rules and the two distinct reasons a gift becomes unattributable.
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "LA SHAE N SHARP-COLLINS for Assembly 2026"). The wider footprint shows every committee LA SHAE N SHARP-COLLINS controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.