PublicReceiptBeta
Electoral receipt · State Assembly

MARK GONZALEZ

State Assembly · ASM-54 · 2026 cycle

Funding Receipt
MARK GONZALEZ · 2026 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Raised for this race $978,495
Funding mix · 320 unique donors · primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $7,914 · 1%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $26,190 · 3%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $944,391 · 97%
Where the money comes from
58% from named interests
What this means →
Sort by
InterestAmountShareGiftsDonors
Other organizations (unclassified)unattributable$232K24%11190
Individuals (no industry data disclosed)unattributable$178K18%11698
Building trades / construction labor$111K11%2018
Other labor unions$98K10%2317
Tribal governments / gaming$71K7%1712
Healthcare / pharma / medical$45K5%2719
Candidate / party transfers$40K4%85
Teachers & education$35K4%53
Public safety (police/fire)$33K3%137
Real estate & development$23K2%98
Energy & utilities$22K2%1211
Entertainment & media$19K2%96
Other named interests
4 categories below 1%: Nurses & healthcare workers, Construction & contractors, Agriculture, Engineers & scientists (public)
$17K2%129
Finance & banking$15K2%85
Legal / trial lawyers$15K1%96
Gaming / sports betting$13K1%63
Business & trade groups$11K1%43

Headline excludes self-funding and the unattributable individuals bucket — gifts from people for whom employer/occupation either isn't disclosed (Cal-Access leaves it blank on roughly 85% of individual contributions) or doesn't fit any sector category. Named interests below 1% of total raised collapse into a single "Other named interests" row to keep the long tail legible; the rolled-up category names are listed inline beneath that row. See the methodology for the classifier rules and the two distinct reasons a gift becomes unattributable.

Top donors to primary committee (25 shown)
01 Mark Gonzalez for Assembly 2024 $27,184
02 Association of California School Administrators PAC $23,600
03 Los Angeles Police Protective League PAC $17,700
04 Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians $11,800
05 Doctors Company Political Action Committee The AKA DOCPAC $11,800
06 Comcast Financial Agency Corporation $11,800
07 Southern California Pipe Trades District Council #16 PAC $11,800
08 UA Journeymen & Apprentices Local #250 $11,800
09 Pechanga Band of Indians $11,800
10 LGBT Caucus Leadership Fund $11,800
11 Gilead Sciences Inc. $11,800
12 CA State Council of Service Employees $11,800
13 Service Employees International Union Local 721, CTW, CLC State & Local $11,800
14 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers Local 92 PAC $11,800
15 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmiths, Forgers and Helpers Local 549 PAC $11,800
16 Service Employees International Union Local 99 Candidate PAC $11,800
17 Service Employees International Union Local 1000 $11,800
18 California Teachers Assn. Assn. For Better Citizenship $11,800
19 United Domestic Workers of America Action Fund $11,800
20 DentaQuest, A Sun Life Company $11,800
21 Faculty for our University's Future, a committee sponsored by the California Faculty Association $10,400
22 Amalgameted Transit Union Local 1277 PAC $10,300
23 Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation $10,000
24 Blue Shield of California $7,500
25 California Dental Association PAC (CDA PAC) $7,400
Primary committee total $978,495
Wider fundraising footprint · primary is 97% of total controlled
GONZALEZ FOR ASSEMBLY 2026; MARK · Primary campaign committee $978,495
GONZALEZ TO SUPPORT PROPOSITION 50; OUR LAND OUR FUTURE A CONTROLLED COMMITTEE BY ASSEMBLY MEMBER MARK · Uncategorized $34,000
All controlled committees $1,012,495
Where the non-primary money goes
$$ Uncategorized $34,000
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology

What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "MARK GONZALEZ for Assembly 2026"). The wider footprint shows every committee MARK GONZALEZ controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.