Electoral receipt · State Assembly
ERIK HARTUNG
State Assembly · ASM-44 · 2024 cycle
Funding Receipt
ERIK HARTUNG · 2024 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 60 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $4,200 · 6%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $8,900 · 12%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $62,500 · 83%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Dhillon, Shivdeep · Sundial Powder Coating $11,000
02 Dog Haus Worldwide LLC(Andre Vener) $11,000
03 Stoddard, Jeremy · Stoddard Design $11,000
04 Hyperlocology $5,500
05 Rosenberg, Elizabeth · The Good Advice Company $5,500
06 Hons, Kristopher · Stevenson Real Estate Services $2,500
07 Sullivan, Ryan · Ryan Sullivan $2,500
08 Delphey, Lauren · n/a $2,000
09 Khan, Faizan · Dog Haus Bethesda $1,500
10 Block, Cindy · LiquorLicense.com $1,000
11 Elster, Scott A. · Prolacta Bioscience $1,000
12 Field, Janet · Janet Field $1,000
13 Gentry, Howard · Intel $1,000
14 Koontz, Jesse · First Wurst LLC dba Dog Haus $1,000
15 Korn, Greg · Kinsella Weitzman $1,000
16 Pathirana, Dylan · Hospman $1,000
17 Rosenberg, Kyle · n/a $1,000
18 Stevenson, David · Stevenson Real Estate Services $1,000
19 Stevenson, Kielo · Stevenson Real Estate Services $1,000
20 O'Connor, Michael · n/a $900
21 Hartung, Libby · n/a $750
22 Rotticci, Jeanie · n/a $750
23 Rotticci, Tom · n/a $750
24 Biro, Ladd · Champion $500
25 Boemer, Jeron · Dog Haus $500
Primary committee total $75,600
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "ERIK HARTUNG for Assembly 2024"). The wider footprint shows every committee ERIK HARTUNG controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.