Electoral receipt · State Assembly
RON EDWARDS
State Assembly · ASM-60 · 2024 cycle
Funding Receipt
RON EDWARDS · 2024 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 87 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $12,074 · 28%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $7,274 · 17%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $23,377 · 55%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 EQUAL RIGHTS FOR ALL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $6,110
02 Riverside Sheriffs Association Political Action Committee $5,500
03 Essayli For Assembly 2024 $5,500
04 Alhindi, Aiman · Christian Family Daycare $4,160
05 Edwards, Alice · Retired $2,285
06 Elder, Larry · Retired $2,000
07 Edwards, Ron · Retired $1,267
08 Ed Delgado For Moreno Valley City Council $1,000
09 Onusz, Austin · DBA: Austin Onusz $1,000
10 Americans for Equality $1,000
11 Weng, Jialan · Retired $772
12 Edwards, Ronald · Retired $750
13 Heriot, Gail · U.San Diego/ USCCR $502
14 Yao, Alwen · Lava electronics Inc $500
15 Kowell, Robert · Retired $500
16 Hall, Sheila · MUSD $344
17 Sivils, Yolanda · Retired $270
18 Schwarzschild, Maimon · Retired $252
19 Du, Zhefeng · Netflix $252
20 Dieleman, Dale · Retired $250
21 Davis, Jeffery · Cogop $250
22 Welsh, Richard · DBA: Richard Welsh $250
23 Roughton, Laura · Wmwd $240
24 Bolog, David · Los Angeles department of water and power $240
25 Weiss, Scott · X $240
Primary committee total $42,726
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "RON EDWARDS for Assembly 2024"). The wider footprint shows every committee RON EDWARDS controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.