Electoral receipt · State Assembly
DAVE OBRAND
State Assembly · ASM-59 · 2024 cycle
Funding Receipt
DAVE OBRAND · 2024 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 83 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $15,371 · 43%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $4,000 · 11%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $16,000 · 45%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) Local 13 PAC $5,000
02 Lyu, Jeffrey · Harbor Freight Tools $3,400
03 Nava, Armando · Armando Nava $2,500
04 Uppal, Robby · Solar Topps $2,500
05 CA Latino PAC $2,000
06 Obrand, Xiomara · Amwins $1,500
07 Cohen, Robert · Robert Cohen $1,250
08 Marine Clerks ILWU Local 63 PAC $1,000
09 Weinmann, Iris · Iris Weinmann $1,000
10 Chen, Allen · Fitbod $500
11 Cohen, Stephanie · Sony Pictures Entertainment $500
12 Herron, Robert · n/a $500
13 Horn, John · Bighorn Financial, Inc. $500
14 Manasse, Adrienne · Cortland Group $500
15 Saetrum, Greg · Squire Patton Boggs $500
16 United Steelworkers District 12 California Non-Federal Account $500
17 Cheung, Kelcey · KPMG $500
18 The Six PAC California $500
19 McInerney, Joseph Aloysius · McInerney Hospitality International $500
20 California Sierra Club P.A.C. $400
21 Evers, Dori · Cultivate Therapy, LLC $325
22 Kopacz, Thomas · United States Air Force $300
23 Rankin, Roxanne · n/a $300
24 Wu, William · Stanford Health Care $271
25 Gillman, Beau · Beau Gillman $250
Primary committee total $35,371
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "DAVE OBRAND for Assembly 2024"). The wider footprint shows every committee DAVE OBRAND controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.