PublicReceiptBeta
Electoral receipt · State Assembly

CARLOS MARQUEZ

State Assembly · ASM-6 · 2024 cycle

Funding Receipt
CARLOS MARQUEZ · 2024 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Raised for this race $230,458
Funding mix · 299 unique donors · primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $43,540 · 19%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $25,250 · 11%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $161,668 · 70%
Top donors to primary committee (25 shown)
01 Marquez, Carlos · CM3 Advocacy, LLC $32,168
02 Bradley, Katherine · CityBridge Foundation $11,000
03 EdVoice for the Kids PAC $5,500
04 Evan Low for Assembly 2024 $5,500
05 Hunkapiller, Beth · n/a $5,500
06 Bloomfield, Bill · n/a $5,500
07 Govern For California Courage Committee $5,500
08 Hastings, Reed · Netflix $5,500
09 Odin One Construction $5,000
10 Oberndorf, William · n/a $5,000
11 Landers, Heidi · n/a $4,500
12 Eli Lilly and Company PAC $4,000
13 Young Minney & Corr, LLP $4,000
14 Fisher, Patrick · Sutter Health $3,000
15 Plumlee, Ken · n/a $3,000
16 Sidie, Myron · Faces, Inc. $3,000
17 Smith, Murdock · Highlands Community Charter School $3,000
18 Clemmens, Mac · Streamline $3,000
19 Political Action by Pest Control Operators $2,500
20 Wallace, Jared · Jared Wallace $2,500
21 21st Century Alliance Good Government PAC $2,500
22 Ahlfeld, Amy · AJA Psychological Services, Inc. $2,500
23 Castrejon, Myrna · California Charter Schools Association $2,500
24 Charter Public Schools PAC $2,500
25 Mecca, Frank · n/a $2,000
Primary committee total $230,458
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology

What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "CARLOS MARQUEZ for Assembly 2024"). The wider footprint shows every committee CARLOS MARQUEZ controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.