Electoral receipt · State Senate
DONALD HAMBURGER
State Senate · SEN-23 · 2024 cycle
Funding Receipt
DONALD HAMBURGER · 2024 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 35 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $4,865 · 34%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $3,563 · 25%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $6,000 · 42%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Hamburger, Diane · William S. Hart Union High School District $1,120
02 Young, Paulette · Retired $1,000
03 Jong, Lee · RGL Companies $1,000
04 Patterson, Ann · RSP $1,000
05 McKeon, Patricia · The McKeon Group $1,000
06 Fowler, Janice · Fowler Farms $1,000
07 Liu, Arthur · Retired $900
08 Helms, Douglas · PACCMG, Inc $521
09 Spalding, Michael · OnlyEscrow $521
10 Norona, Patty · Info Requested $521
11 Valencia Acura $500
12 SANTA CLARITA AUTOMOBILE DEALERS ASSOCIATION $500
13 Roseberry, Karen · Care Net $500
14 Skinner, Jeffrey · Prism $469
15 Crueldad, Ianemmanuel · Oprx $450
16 Greig, Celeste · Retired $339
17 Hamburger, Catherine · Retired $261
18 Rogers, Patrick · Perris Pawn $260
19 Morgan, Lourdes · LA County Department of Public Health $209
20 Rogovin, Jarrow · Investor/Consultant $209
21 Stallard, Niall · Retired $209
22 McKee, Ryan · SOA $209
23 Hartman, Christopher · PA ANG $209
24 Leonhardt, Catolyn · Retired $200
25 Gammert, Adriana · Retired $200
Primary committee total $14,428
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Senate in this cycle (e.g. "DONALD HAMBURGER for Assembly 2024"). The wider footprint shows every committee DONALD HAMBURGER controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.