Electoral receipt · State Senate
ANTHONY KUO
State Senate · SEN-37 · 2024 cycle
Funding Receipt
ANTHONY KUO · 2024 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 185 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $20,489 · 6%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $13,991 · 4%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $292,198 · 89%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 CALIFORNIA REPUBLICAN PARTY $154,446
02 KUO, ANTHONY · CANDIDATE $9,062
03 ZHANG, CHARLES · ZION ENTERPRISES $5,500
04 ORANGE COUNTY PAC $5,500
05 CARROLL, MICHAEL · CORPGEN COUNSEL $5,500
06 IRVINE MANAGEMENT COMPANY $5,500
07 SCHROEDER, PAUL · SCHROEDER MANAGEMENT CO., $5,500
08 BRIAN JONES FOR LT. GOVERNOR 2026 $5,500
09 ROGER NIELLO FOR SENATE 2026 $5,500
10 NEW MAJORITY PAC $5,500
11 CAO, SEAN · CAMPHOR PARTNERS $5,500
12 STANBRIDGE UNIVERSITY $5,500
13 SCHROEDER, CATHY · RETIRED $5,000
14 FUJISHIGE, BETH · MC EQUITIES $4,710
15 J & R GROUP LLC $3,000
16 HOROVITZ, EDWARD · RDS PARTNERS, INC $3,000
17 POSNOCK, STUART · GARDEN COMMUNITIES $3,000
18 HARDIN, ERIC · HARDIN AUTOMOTIVE $2,500
19 NOMMANSEN, CHRISTOPHER · CAMEL FINANCIAL INC $2,500
20 USA SIGNAGE LLC $2,500
21 WANG, JULIANA · KINGS TWO DENTAL SUPPLY $2,500
22 ORANGE COUNTY AUTOMOBILE DEALERS ASSOCIATION PAC $2,500
23 THE LAW OFFICES OF PATRICK B. STRADER, PC $2,500
24 SHELLY, DAMON · IRVINE BMW $2,095
25 STRADER, CAMILLE · RAMSGATE PROPERTIES $2,000
Primary committee total $326,679
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Senate in this cycle (e.g. "ANTHONY KUO for Assembly 2024"). The wider footprint shows every committee ANTHONY KUO controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.