Electoral receipt · State Assembly
EVAN M. MINTON
State Assembly · ASM-6 · 2024 cycle
Funding Receipt
EVAN M. MINTON · 2024 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 355 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $55,247 · 23%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $23,000 · 9%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $164,000 · 68%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Grove, Karen Frances · None $11,000
02 Minton, Candy · None $11,000
03 Minton, James A. · Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory $11,000
04 Simon, Daniel A. · None $11,000
05 Imper, James · None $10,000
06 Ash Kalra for Assembly 2024 $5,500
07 Consumer Attorneys of California PAC $5,500
08 Delaney, M. Quinn · None $5,500
09 Grasseschi, Barbara · Puma Springs Vineyards $5,500
10 Osborne, Paul Wayne · KOOP $5,500
11 Straus, Faye M. · None $5,500
12 Thomas, Elizabeth A. · Larger Than Life Productions $5,500
13 California Progressive PAC $5,500
14 Jordan, Wayne · JREI $5,500
15 Steinglass, David · None $5,500
16 Crabb, Anthony · None $5,000
17 Dave Jones for Treasurer 2026 $4,000
18 Minton, Evan · Voices for Progress $3,000
19 Paschal, Nikki · Paschal Roth Public Affairs $2,750
20 Ferari, Kyle · Munoz & Co $2,500
21 Hunt-Scott, Shannon · The Scott Foundation $2,500
22 Kahn, Marc · None $2,500
23 Shelton Leipzig, Dominique · Mayer Brown $2,500
24 Tucker, Isaac · UCLA $2,500
25 Weinholtz, Donna · None $2,500
Primary committee total $242,247
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "EVAN M. MINTON for Assembly 2024"). The wider footprint shows every committee EVAN M. MINTON controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.