Electoral receipt · State Senate
GUY SELLECK
State Senate · SEN-37 · 2024 cycle
Funding Receipt
GUY SELLECK · 2024 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 37 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $3,600 · 1%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $4,000 · 2%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $235,298 · 97%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 CALIFORNIA REPUBLICAN PARTY $154,446
02 Selleck, Guy · Builders Max Inc $46,352
03 Mirzayev, Stonex · StoneX Tile $5,500
04 Deacero USA $5,500
05 Mirzayev, Elchin · Solidshape $5,500
06 Sarhad, Violet · Violet Boutique Inc $5,500
07 Selleck, Guy L. · NA $5,500
08 Galvez, Steven · MHS 98 LLC $2,000
09 Munoz, Michele · Munoz Insurance Agency $1,500
10 Brown, David · Essayli & Brown LLP $1,000
11 Crevier, Donald · NA $1,000
12 Ferguson, Jack · Jack Ferguson CPA $1,000
13 Johnson, John · NA $1,000
14 MX California LLC (Laurence Roberts) $1,000
15 Mirzayev, Emin · StoneX Tile $500
16 Committee to Elect Kim Cousins $500
17 Cooke, Franklin · New South Construction Supply LLC $500
18 Gilmore, Larry · Gilmore Construction $500
19 Leinberger, Penny · Marshall Schools $500
20 Hariri, Mona · Intel $300
21 Sarhad, Brandon · Detla Loan Consulting $300
22 Carroll, Michael · Nucor $250
23 Singh, Abhi · Singh Holdings LLC $250
24 Sobeck, James · Sobeck Investments $250
25 Zargarian, Amir · Silynx Communications Inc $250
Primary committee total $242,898
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Senate in this cycle (e.g. "GUY SELLECK for Assembly 2024"). The wider footprint shows every committee GUY SELLECK controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.