PublicReceiptBeta
Electoral receipt · State Assembly

LONG "DAVID" LIU

State Assembly · ASM-49 · 2024 cycle

Funding Receipt
LONG "DAVID" LIU · 2024 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Raised for this race $174,767
Funding mix · 103 unique donors · primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $10,192 · 6%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $13,275 · 8%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $151,300 · 87%
Top donors to primary committee (25 shown)
01 Liu, David · DBA: David Liu $91,000
02 I360, LLC $8,600
03 Long, Tao · Retired $5,500
04 Chee, David · DDC Electric Supply Inc $5,500
05 TRK Customs Service, Inc $5,500
06 Peng, Hongbin · JP Las Consulting, Inc. $5,500
07 Deng, Daniel · Law Office of Daniel Deng $5,000
08 Chi, Xiaoping · Retired $5,000
09 A&A Medical Supplies, Inc $3,000
10 Hu, Philip · Transglobal Holding Co $2,500
11 Huang, Xiaosheng · Law huang intl. $2,500
12 Milton, Nancy · Milton Milton Preferred Properties $1,500
13 Pu, Xuelin · Retired $1,500
14 Shi, George · University of Wisconsin - Madison $1,250
15 Xu, Xiaoyan · Retired $1,200
16 Delightsme Care And Services LLC $1,000
17 Popeney, Feng · Pan Feng Realty $1,000
18 Young, Zhanfen · JBY Enterprise, Inc $1,000
19 Chao, Myrtle · Skylink TV $1,000
20 Gong, Kai · Prime Plus Food $1,000
21 Z4 Logistics, Inc $1,000
22 Chen, Joseph · Retired $1,000
23 Liu, Xiaolin · Retired $1,000
24 Zhu, Hongyan · UC Irvine $750
25 Zhang, Grace · DBA: Grace Zhang $525
Primary committee total $174,767
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology

What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "LONG "DAVID" LIU for Assembly 2024"). The wider footprint shows every committee LONG "DAVID" LIU controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.