ALEXANDRA M MACEDO
State Assembly · ASM-33 · 2026 cycle
| Interest | Amount | Share | Gifts | Donors |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other organizations (unclassified)unattributable | $260K | 27% | 134 | 113 |
| Agriculture | $175K | 18% | 112 | 98 |
| Candidate / party transfers | $136K | 14% | 4 | 2 |
| Individuals (no industry data disclosed)unattributable | $95K | 10% | 88 | 80 |
| Tribal governments / gaming | $62K | 7% | 17 | 11 |
| Energy & utilities | $49K | 5% | 19 | 11 |
| Healthcare / pharma / medical | $46K | 5% | 31 | 20 |
| Public safety (police/fire) | $24K | 3% | 15 | 8 |
| Real estate & development | $22K | 2% | 7 | 5 |
| Construction & contractors | $17K | 2% | 12 | 7 |
| Other named interests 3 categories below 1%: Finance & banking, Legal / trial lawyers, Other labor unions | $17K | 2% | 11 | 11 |
| Gaming / sports betting | $14K | 1% | 10 | 3 |
| Business & trade groups | $13K | 1% | 3 | 3 |
| Building trades / construction labor | $12K | 1% | 4 | 4 |
| Entertainment & media | $12K | 1% | 4 | 3 |
Headline excludes self-funding and the unattributable individuals bucket — gifts from people for whom employer/occupation either isn't disclosed (Cal-Access leaves it blank on roughly 85% of individual contributions) or doesn't fit any sector category. Named interests below 1% of total raised collapse into a single "Other named interests" row to keep the long tail legible; the rolled-up category names are listed inline beneath that row. See the methodology for the classifier rules and the two distinct reasons a gift becomes unattributable.
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "ALEXANDRA M MACEDO for Assembly 2026"). The wider footprint shows every committee ALEXANDRA M MACEDO controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.