Electoral receipt · State Assembly
FRANKLIN J. MYERS
State Assembly · ASM-2 · 2024 cycle
Funding Receipt
FRANKLIN J. MYERS · 2024 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 129 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $12,848 · 8%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $6,250 · 4%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $132,500 · 87%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Wilton Rancheria $11,000
02 Yurok Tribe $8,500
03 California Nations Indian Gaming Association Sovereignty Protection Fund $5,500
04 Davis, Jed · Jed Davis $5,500
05 Finley, Shannon · Capitol Counsel, LLC $5,500
06 Ramos, James · State of California $5,500
07 Ramos, Theresa · n/a $5,500
08 Ramsey, Robert E. · First American Petroleum $5,500
09 San Manuel Band of Mission Indians $5,500
10 Zarate, Carolyn · n/a $5,500
11 Zarate, Sean · Z Fuels $5,500
12 Dr. Joaquin Arambula for Assembly 2024 $5,500
13 Pechanga Band of Indians $5,500
14 Black Oak Casino Resort $5,000
15 Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians $5,000
16 Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians $5,000
17 Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC $5,000
18 The Ione Band of Miwok Indians $3,500
19 Karuk Tribe $2,500
20 Pala Band of Mission Indians $2,500
21 Miller, Dale · Elk Valley Rancheria $2,500
22 Morongo Band of Mission Indians $2,500
23 Table Mountain Rancheria $2,500
24 Trout PAC (TROUTPAC) $2,500
25 Kelly, Tina Marie · n/a $2,500
Primary committee total $151,598
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "FRANKLIN J. MYERS for Assembly 2024"). The wider footprint shows every committee FRANKLIN J. MYERS controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.