Electoral receipt · State Assembly
XAVIER AVILA
State Assembly · ASM-33 · 2024 cycle
Funding Receipt
XAVIER AVILA · 2024 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 80 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $9,265 · 16%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $8,000 · 14%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $39,075 · 69%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Spencer, Richard F. · Spencer Enterprises $11,000
02 Maloy, Linda M. · n/a $5,115
03 Curti, Justin · Curti Family Inc $3,000
04 Curti Family Inc $2,500
05 Western United Daries PAC $2,500
06 Monteiro, Manuel · Lakeside Dairy $1,500
07 Netto, Delia · Netto Enterprises, LLC $1,500
08 Borba Dairy $1,500
09 Harrell, Stephen C. · n/a $1,500
10 O'Sullivan, Thomas J. · Zens & O'Sullivan $1,500
11 Strachan, Craig · Gloamin Holdings LLC $1,200
12 Aguiar, Kerrin · Bacome Parker Insurance $1,061
13 Curti, Benjamin · Curtimade Dairy, Inc. $1,000
14 Presant, Stephen · n/a $1,000
15 Moonlight Sales Corporation $1,000
16 Personal Insurance Federation of CA Agents & Employees PAC $1,000
17 Mooney, Kevin · n/a $1,000
18 Tulare County Medical Society PAC $1,000
19 Legacy Ranches $1,000
20 Contente, Joaquin · Self-Employed (Joaquin Contente) $750
21 Brazil, Patricia · n/a $625
22 Avila, William · VAS $600
23 Avila, Rose Marie · n/a $500
24 Valadao, Miguel · Jackson Dairy LLC $500
25 Isherwood, Patrick · Self-Help Enterprises $500
Primary committee total $56,340
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "XAVIER AVILA for Assembly 2024"). The wider footprint shows every committee XAVIER AVILA controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.