Electoral receipt · State Assembly
PAUL SEO
State Assembly · ASM-66 · 2026 cycle
Funding Receipt
PAUL SEO · 2026 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 523 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $55,235 · 8%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $71,300 · 10%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $563,299 · 82%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Seo, Paul H · State of California $13,706
02 PPI America, Inc. $11,800
03 CA State Council of Service Employees $11,800
04 SEIU Local 2015 State PAC $11,800
05 SEIU United Healthcare Workers West PAC $11,800
06 Kim, Daniel · Benebios $11,800
07 Kim, Hyung S. · None $11,800
08 Kim, Young Ok · None $11,800
09 Seo, Kyong Ok · None $11,800
10 Seo, Song Ho · None $11,800
11 Han, James · None $11,800
12 Kiehm, Jamie · KPG Healthcare $11,800
13 Yeun, Steven · One Nine Productions $11,800
14 Kim, Hannah · Providence $11,800
15 Cho, Robert · Christina & Rob Cho $11,800
16 Stephanie Nguyen for Assembly 2026 $5,900
17 Mike Fong for Assembly 2026 $5,900
18 Service Employees International Union Local 721, CTW, CLC State & Local $5,900
19 Lee, Kawon · Rothrock Senior Care Services $5,900
20 Kou, Ming Shin · Red Chamber Co. $5,900
21 Patrick Ahrens for Assembly 2026 $5,900
22 E-W Services, Inc. $5,900
23 Whang, Stuart · Colosseum Athletics $5,900
24 Asian Pacific Islander Leadership PAC $5,900
25 Sethi, Shaan · None $5,900
Primary committee total $689,834
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "PAUL SEO for Assembly 2026"). The wider footprint shows every committee PAUL SEO controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.