Electoral receipt · State Senate
MICHAEL NEWHOUSE
State Senate · SEN-24 · 2026 cycle
Funding Receipt
MICHAEL NEWHOUSE · 2026 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 465 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $58,081 · 12%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $64,400 · 13%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $373,516 · 75%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Brauninger, Scott · Build Group $11,800
02 Clark, Andrew · Build Group $11,800
03 Silverton, Gail · Gail Silverton $11,800
04 Peace Officers Research Association of California PAC (PORAC PAC) Small Contributor Committee $11,800
05 California Real Estate PAC (CREPAC) - California Association of Realtors $10,800
06 Safai, Bob · Bob Safai $8,400
07 Halfon, Jay · Halfon & Boehm, PC $6,900
08 Wise, Jerry · Jerry Wise $6,900
09 Ruiz, Jorge M. · NTAS Maintenance & Engineering $6,000
10 Sutter, Gary · n/a $6,000
11 Zislis, Michael · The Zislis Group, LLC $5,948
12 Clean Energy $5,900
13 Everest, Ann · General Real Estate Management $5,900
14 Jones, Kenneth · Build Group $5,900
15 Perttula, Joshua · Kirra Consulting $5,900
16 Taub, David · Latham & Watkins, LLP $5,900
17 Evans, Berne · Sun Pacific $5,900
18 Sullivan, Mike · Honda of Santa Monica $5,900
19 Watson Land Company $5,900
20 California New Car Dealers Association PAC $5,900
21 Associated General Contractors PAC of California $5,900
22 United Contractors PAC $5,900
23 Kilian, Robert · Westside Build, Inc. $5,500
24 Goldstein, Cliff · GPI Companies $5,000
25 Bloomfield, Bill · n/a $5,000
Primary committee total $495,997
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Senate in this cycle (e.g. "MICHAEL NEWHOUSE for Assembly 2026"). The wider footprint shows every committee MICHAEL NEWHOUSE controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.