PublicReceiptBeta
Electoral receipt · State Assembly

MICHAEL MURPHY

State Assembly · ASM-27 · 2026 cycle

Funding Receipt
MICHAEL MURPHY · 2026 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Raised for this race $347,100
Funding mix · 257 unique donors · primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $25,245 · 7%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $25,603 · 7%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $296,252 · 85%
Top donors to primary committee (25 shown)
01 Ayers, Yvonne · Retired $11,800
02 Larson, Peg · Trans County Title $11,800
03 Alexandra Macedo For Assembly 2026 $11,800
04 Fishman, Alex · Empros Capital $11,800
05 Fishman, Rachel · Homemaker $11,800
06 Neal Partners, LP $11,800
07 Juan Alanis for Assembly 2026 $11,800
08 Joseph Gallo Cheese Company LP $9,400
09 Merced Police Officers Association PAC $6,100
10 Gallagher for Assembly 2024 $5,900
11 Heath Flora for Assembly 2026 $5,900
12 Kelly, Matthew · North Point $5,900
13 Manousos, Elias · Retired $5,900
14 PG&E Corporation $5,900
15 Sanford, Tom · Wvmccd $5,900
16 Merced City Fire Fighters PAC $5,900
17 Personal Insurance Federation of CA Agents & Employees PAC $5,900
18 California Association of Nurse Anesthetists PAC $5,900
19 David Tangipa for Assembly 2026 $5,900
20 James Gallagher for Lt. Governor 2026 $5,900
21 Johnson for Assembly 2026 $5,900
22 Lyons Investment Management, LLC and Affiliated Entities $5,000
23 Roberts, Grey · Grey B. Roberts & Co $3,750
24 Cunningham, James · Retired $3,700
25 Elbulinick Properties LLC $3,500
Primary committee total $347,100
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology

What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "MICHAEL MURPHY for Assembly 2026"). The wider footprint shows every committee MICHAEL MURPHY controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.