Electoral receipt · State Senate
ERIC ALEGRIA
State Senate · SEN-24 · 2026 cycle
Funding Receipt
ERIC ALEGRIA · 2026 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 205 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $29,335 · 19%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $16,400 · 11%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $107,797 · 70%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Alegria, Patricia · None $11,800
02 Alegria, Steven · None $11,800
03 Long Point Development, LLC dba Terranea Resort(Ralph Grippo) $5,900
04 Peterson, Jack · NFL $5,900
05 Lin, Roger · None $5,900
06 Seo, Paul · State of California $5,447
07 Alegria, Brian · CPC International Apple Co. $5,000
08 Gustafson, Clark · None $3,000
09 Borrelli, Dunia · None $2,750
10 Alegria, Jon · CPC International Apple Co. $2,500
11 Alegria, Lora · None $2,500
12 Christie, Kathryn · None $2,500
13 Crown, Janet S. · Brewery X $2,500
14 Robinson, Steven · Brewery X $2,500
15 Garcia, Sandro · Janux Therapeutics $2,000
16 Mike Gatto for LT. Governor 2026 $2,000
17 Peterson, Henry · Motion Picture Corporation of America $2,000
18 Robinson, Tara L. · Brewery X $2,000
19 Bozler, Dianne · None $2,000
20 Duhovic, Rosanne · None $2,000
21 Culbertson, Brad · None $1,750
22 Cruikshank, Jennifer · JMC2, Inc. $1,500
23 Edgerton, Kathryn · None $1,500
24 Cliff Numark for El Camino College Board 2022 $1,500
25 South, Steve · EDCO $1,250
Primary committee total $153,532
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Senate in this cycle (e.g. "ERIC ALEGRIA for Assembly 2026"). The wider footprint shows every committee ERIC ALEGRIA controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.