Electoral receipt · State Assembly
GERALD BOURSIQUOT
State Assembly · ASM-75 · 2026 cycle
Funding Receipt
GERALD BOURSIQUOT · 2026 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 28 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $4,872 · 75%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $1,600 · 25%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $0 · 0%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Sunrise Political Solutions, Inc $1,150
02 Boursiquot, Gerald · Retired $1,050
03 Summers, Diane · Retired $750
04 Atkins, Cynthia · Self: dba Atkins Nursery $400
05 Strahan, Angelique · FLW Huntington Beach $300
06 Connell, Lynn · Not Employed $250
07 Schaefer, Michael · State Of CA $200
08 Kornfeld, Carol · Not Employed $200
09 Burns Price, Bonnie · Not Employed $200
10 Squarespace Inc $192
11 Beigelman, Paul · Not Employed $130
12 Egkan, Jeff · Not Employed $100
13 Mercado, Jose · Kochurtrummer $100
14 Schneider, Deborah · Retired $100
15 Emblem, Thor · GSH Group $100
16 Hoffman, Gerald · Retired $100
17 Hussain, Sajjad · Indus Pacific Law Office $100
18 Manaster, Carl · Galley Solutions $100
19 Mervich, Mark · Retired $100
20 Morrison, Curtis · Morrison Urena LC $100
21 Peoples, Eric · Data Intelligence LLC $100
22 Sanchez, Eloy · Not Employed $100
23 Sissenwein, Annette · Retired $100
24 Tanner, Jodi · Not Employed $100
25 Chezar, Linda · Not Employed $100
Primary committee total $6,472
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "GERALD BOURSIQUOT for Assembly 2026"). The wider footprint shows every committee GERALD BOURSIQUOT controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.